Gianaameri: Most importantly I would not jump into any conclusion before I had the facts straight, and I wouldn't expect to get them from a web forum (even if it was as esteemed as CDF

). Which is why I refraine myself from commenting anything but in general. Usually there's a clause that allows the authorities to give permits past all other regulation, if they feel a project is for the general good. Permits can often also be issued on the grounds, that the authorities want more information, before they can establish their criteria. This is quite usual; to be able to collect data, without having to go through the whole permitting process. Kannattaa tutkia, ennen kuin alkaa hutkia, an excellent Finnish saying which basically means it's good to do your research, before dealing punches left and right, holds especially true working with cases, where an official conduct is only in the making. This is because there's usually always a clause, which will allow exceptions, when the authorities feel it serves greater good. It's quite humane to feel there must be a misconduct somewhere, because one feels maltreated and disappointed. However that often is not the case.
bent: Fully realizing you're comment directed at my post was only intended to be insulting, I gladly admit I'm always, despite their affiliation, a fangal of hard working professionals, who do high quality work for greater good. Even more so, if the individuals have a generous, helpful and friendly attitude towards a fellow man.
Bookmarks