I never bothered with buddy/DM verification stuff. I suppose my first few OW dives in class were signed by the instructor but I never even thought of it that way. I remember a dive store trying really hard to "stamp" my logbook with their store stamp to verify. It was hard to explain to them that the log only existed in digital form.
I'm a complete data nut. I still wistfully think about transfering more of the old paper logs to electronic format (about hundred or so have still only basic data in electronic form because I haven't fully transcribed the text over). The written pages were often quite wordy. The Bridge software only alllowed 1000 characters of text for "comments" per dive and I was always resorting to a form of shorthand to cram everything in. Even when my divebook was only a few hundred dives it filled a thick notebook binder and stuffed with divesite research pages from Bennet and Elliots, pictures, etc.
Computer downloaded dives are a lot more "verified" than "signed" logs. Much harder to fake, crammed with info even before one starts to add comments and dive pressures. A single dive computer these days could retain a year of underwater dive activity in memory (as in the Sensus can be left in the water for a year and you come and pick it up and download the data).



Reply With Quote
Semper Fi, Cameron David Smith, my son, my hero. 11/9/1989 - 11/13/2010
I guess maybe to see how gullible I was (and willing to buy either more training or gear). But I never used him again.


Bookmarks