Forrest. Unless I'm missing something, this sure seems like the base plan was at odds with the continuous guideline to the surface rule; and a pretty questionable strategy in any case. But I know I have executed some less than perfect dive plans and have had fortunate outcomes.
Lets see... owners change, owners calm down post event and they also regain trust in local divers/cavers. Have seen it happen in Arkansas... maybe not international news but "explorers" lost, big news story, "explorers" found.... cave closed.... then open back up after all the press has been gone for awhile. Not totally sure of TN law but I'm betting it is very similar to Arkansas law where if the owner isn't charging for access they can't be sued for accidents that happen on their property.
So yes I have faith that it will re-open.
Why yes that was me inshorts and a t-shirt
oops, a drysuit @ the 700' marker
Guys, let’s wait until we know the relevant facts. I don’t doubt Forrest about the info he conveyed but perhaps there is more to the protocol they followed than what has been inferred. That protocol, obviously, as this incident shows, is not sound.
Also tourist cave divers or explorers, let’s be careful out there and try not to be complacent. We are fortunate to have Edd (and others) but he literally puts his life on the line every time he goes recovering/rescuing cave divers.
I was asking for relevant facts. FW said he spoke to them. I asked 2 or 3 times and it wasn't answered. Not sure where you think relevant facts will be coming from? I think if FW spoke to them directly since he knows them, he should be able to supply relevant facts (as he already did).
Bookmarks