Bubble Model
Varying Permeability Model
Gradient Factors – Even – Like 30/70 or 20/80
Gradient Factors – Favor Deep Stops – Like 20/70
Gradient Factors – Favor Shallow Stops – Like 40/80
Ratio Deco
Tables – Like Navy
Other - please explain
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt
"If a small thing has the power to make you angry, does that not indicate something about your size?" ~Sydney J. Harris
If you are looking for a "calculator" you won't find it. However the BVM(3) model is well documented in the literature, although in its equational form. You being an "engineer", shouldn't have any problems with the handling the calculations required to come up with the schedules you would like to look at.....
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt
"If a small thing has the power to make you angry, does that not indicate something about your size?" ~Sydney J. Harris
Jax, you, like others on the "deep stops" thread, seem to be missing the point. These are not schedules that anyone would actually use in practice. The study was designed to produce DCS and the profiles were exaggerated to produce statistically meaningful results.
The way I understood it though was that the model actually would have been intended to being used..
For sure though within the model the stops were accentuated to make differences statistically relevant..
BTW.. Jax a certain programmer of a widely used bubble model would love your argument..
He was claiming that these profiles have nothing to to with Rec-Tec diving and thus there are NO conclusions to be drawn from the test..
Neglecting the designed approach to the study..
And please look at the heat maps in the video of Simon..
Or go to the source that thread at RBW.. it is still there.. Just some stuff might not appear to make sense anymore due to the heavy cencorship after the fact, but it is still there..
loadfs of comparison heat maps have been produced and actually using "conservative" profiles with current models, that rec-tec divers would actually dive..
that is in the video as well though..
Yes, they are probabilistic models that can produce schedules you could actually use but for the purposes of the study the probability of DCS was significantly increased. No one associated with the study is suggesting that these are schedules anyone would use in the field.
Man! But I am confused. Don't you guys use computers?
Or are you contemplating writing your own programs? Cause frankly I think the way people feel is so anecdotal and subjective that you could spend your remaining days varying your conservatism and M values and never think anything changes.
Bob
Bookmarks