+1 for what Skip stated.
+1 for what Skip stated.
"...some night, in the chill darkness, someone will make a mistake: The sea will show him no mercy." John T. Cunningham
No, all this guy has to do is make a public announcement, on FB maybe, that he's heard that someone is trying to frame him by writing his name in the rock in JB. That's enough to raise reasonable doubt.
Maybe I should just send him a FB message and advise him of such.
Whoever said money can't buy love never bought a puppy.
Wasn't it Skip that warned about the dangers of saying too much on the internet just a couple of pages back?
See post #33
Do you guys who are all for open discussion and lack of secrecy believe we should be posting up our troop movements in Afghanistan? Who cares if our servicemen and women might be killed. It's unamerican to keep secrets. We have the right to know!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, I'm being sarcastic. There times when too much is kept secret and I may argue for more exposure, but I complete reject the argument that nothing should be secret. Reasonable people can discuss the merits of particular topics or incidents and whether privacy is appropriate in any given case.
If Edd and the JCSO want things secret, that's good enough for me. I mean what the heck difference does it make if *I* (or you) know how the sheriff is conducting the investigation. He's got Edd to collaborate with. He's surely not gonna come read the CDF to learn how to do his job.
Land of Enchantment -- not so great for cave diving, but mighty scenic!
Is that all it takes?
Do you really find some similarity with this thread and the war on afghanistan? Can you be more dramatic?
Oh, OK, good... I thought the crazies were escaping again![]()
I agree, but I also think the doofus who gouged into the walls probably doesn't have the CDF on his favorites list anywhere.
That was as dramatic as I could come up with, without trying. Some people on this forumseem to need to be hit over the head by a 2 x 4 to understand a point.
Amazing
I have no problem with someone having a differing opinion on a particular example. It's the giant, sweeping, overriding, "always" statements that just aren't true that I have a big issue with.
Land of Enchantment -- not so great for cave diving, but mighty scenic!
All Hail WikiLeaks! Open up them secrets. Reveal all. Truth can not live in secrecy, only Lies live in secrecy. When we claim to be honest good people, then employ torture and subterfuge against our enemies we are doing nothing but showing the world we are the Liars. I would not have troops in Afganistan. So secret troop movements would not be needed. It's not a perfect world and our government will always keep secrets, but that doesn't mean we have to. And if these guys learn that the CDF is out to get them, so what? I really doubt that a few days or weeks headstart on making up a cover story will change anything. I mean come on, if you can't prove that they were there, had the opportunity, with few there before and after the crime....well, then you can't really find them guilty. If we have our ducks in a row, no amount of advanced knowledge we're looking for them will get them off the hook.
Now if they are dumb enough to brag on FB, post pics, etc., no need to hunt much further. And that's really what my earlier post (#33) was about, not that we should all go hush-hush.
I've said it before....we need signs to alert people that scratching names and graffiti in caves is bad form. The desire to leave a mark, to paint, scratch, write your name, in wet concrete and cave walls is just too great. A simple sign explaining how this is not a proper place for such behavior would do more for cave conservation than all the hoo-haw of prosecution after the fact.
I got a hundred bucks to donate for signage. Who's gonna make them and install them?
skip
"Learning the techniques of others does not interfere with the discovery of techniques of one's own." B.F. Skinner, 1970.
Bookmarks