Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Moderator Alumni
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in BFE outside of Mousetown
    Posts
    3,010

    Default Cavedive while you can...

    Might not be long before all the caves are unsafe (water quality) or just dry...

    Thanks to the Supreme Court "making laws" instead of applying them.

    http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/19/real...ourt/index.htm

    Joe


    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Pyle
    "After my first 10 hours on a rebreather, I was a real expert. Another 40 hours of dive time later, I considered myself a novice. When I had completed about 100 hours of rebreather diving, I realized I was only just a beginner."

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Homeless, USA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Thankfully it only applies to Federal regulations. State regulations will still apply.


  3. #3
    Moderator Alumni
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in BFE outside of Mousetown
    Posts
    3,010

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdenney
    Thankfully it only applies to Federal regulations. State regulations will still apply for now.
    Fixed.

    Joe


    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Pyle
    "After my first 10 hours on a rebreather, I was a real expert. Another 40 hours of dive time later, I considered myself a novice. When I had completed about 100 hours of rebreather diving, I realized I was only just a beginner."

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    North Miami
    Posts
    346

    Default Cave dive while you can ...

    If one reads Justice Roberts' majority opinion in Rapanos vs. Engineers carefully, it appears that the newly conservative Supreme Court is trying to AVOID making laws. Roberts' opinion takes the language of the Clean Water Act as a layman would take it. This is how most of the congressmen who voted for the act interpreted the language. The Corps of Engineers was arguing that the language of the act should be interpreted as an engineer would interpret it. Since few congressmen are engineers, accepting that argument would effectively make new law.
    We need to ask our congressmen for a new clean water act based on 21st century hydrologic engineering principles rather than on 19th century ones.

    "I like to do dangerous things safely."


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts