Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Pompano Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjack
    Every outdoor activity I've ever been involved in has a subgroup that wishes the noobs would go away and its rising popularity hadn't happened.
    There are always some exceptions but for the most part, most everybody wants to close the door behind them, it's human nature.

    It's bad luck to be superstitious.

  2. #32
    Guest

    Default Re: Limiting the nuimber of dives.

    Quote Originally Posted by aainslie
    (Note to self - use more smiley faces when being tongue in cheek)
    Tell me about it. I can't believe how many people thought I was being serious about banning everybody certified since 2001.

    (Just about everybody I dive with falls in that category. It was a jab at THEM.)


  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY USA
    Posts
    227

    Default Re: Limiting the nuimber of dives.

    Quote Originally Posted by Slüdge
    Quote Originally Posted by aainslie
    (Note to self - use more smiley faces when being tongue in cheek)
    Tell me about it. I can't believe how many people thought I was being serious about banning everybody certified since 2001.
    I hate to point out that there are research , exploration divers who would like nothing better than to ban all cave diving except for research purposes.

    They can't be ignored.

    If damage appears to be on the upswing, or comes to the attention of politicians looking for their mark, then it's bye bye to all but those SPECIAL few and connected cave divers.

    Dale

    An independent diver.

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Pompano Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjack
    Humans = impacts. The more humans you have the greater the chance for bad apples to show up. Whether they carve their names in the Sequoias or in the clay banks of Cow.

    Ironically enough, Pompey's Pillar in MT is where William Clark carved his name in a sandstone butte in July of 1806, it's still there!

    One of the greatest explorers of all time is guilty of intentionally defacing the landscape

    It's bad luck to be superstitious.

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Seattle area
    Posts
    651

    Default

    One person's defacing is another's testimony to man's triumph over nature.


  6. #36

    Default Re: Limiting the nuimber of dives.

    [quote="aainslie"]
    Quote Originally Posted by saturation
    Still, you're actually agreeing with me. See note below - my earlier post was intended as humour. (I know, I'm not very funny - my girlfriend reminds me of the hourly at home). I think we need to trash a few caves, and keep others more pristine. Short of using tunnelling equipment, how much more could we screw up the first 600 ft of Ginnie? So given it's already a disaster, keep training and early diving there. it can be our Yosemite. Then the other sites can be like our Whitney mountaineer's trail (sorry, I don't know what the equivalent mountais are in Florida )- harder to get to, limited access, and kept low-impact and pretty pristine.

    (Note to self - use more smiley faces when being tongue in cheek)

    On the bold items specifically:

    Yes couldn't agree more, even 'tongue in cheek' there is method to the 'madness.'

    If underwater caves were kept off limits except to research, when the time comes to save the caves, there could more resistance to funding or legislation due to the dearth of public sympathy. Similar to reefs, the most vocal champions for reef relief are among recreational divers ... yet diver presence contributes to damage to many reefs.



 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts