There are always some exceptions but for the most part, most everybody wants to close the door behind them, it's human nature.Originally Posted by rjack
There are always some exceptions but for the most part, most everybody wants to close the door behind them, it's human nature.Originally Posted by rjack
It's bad luck to be superstitious.
Tell me about it. I can't believe how many people thought I was being serious about banning everybody certified since 2001.Originally Posted by aainslie
(Just about everybody I dive with falls in that category. It was a jab at THEM.)
I hate to point out that there are research , exploration divers who would like nothing better than to ban all cave diving except for research purposes.Originally Posted by Slüdge
They can't be ignored.
If damage appears to be on the upswing, or comes to the attention of politicians looking for their mark, then it's bye bye to all but those SPECIAL few and connected cave divers.
Dale
An independent diver.
Originally Posted by rjack
Ironically enough, Pompey's Pillar in MT is where William Clark carved his name in a sandstone butte in July of 1806, it's still there!
One of the greatest explorers of all time is guilty of intentionally defacing the landscape![]()
It's bad luck to be superstitious.
One person's defacing is another's testimony to man's triumph over nature.![]()
[quote="aainslie"]Originally Posted by saturation
On the bold items specifically:
Yes couldn't agree more, even 'tongue in cheek' there is method to the 'madness.'
If underwater caves were kept off limits except to research, when the time comes to save the caves, there could more resistance to funding or legislation due to the dearth of public sympathy. Similar to reefs, the most vocal champions for reef relief are among recreational divers ... yet diver presence contributes to damage to many reefs.
Bookmarks