I don't have enough experience doing the traverse to give much of a reply. I will say that I did take a stage the first (and only) time that I did the whole traverse. My buddy and I did everything by the book and ended up swimming the distance several times over and doing some of the other traverses in the process. Some on purpose, some due to navigational disagreements that were easier discussed by surfacing at Olsen. I love all the available exits at Peacock, it just makes the long swim dives so much more manageable.Funny you should mention the traverse. I remember needing a stage to do that dive, but I don't now. For the life of me, I can't figure out what is different, except maybe gear is better now.
Back to the point... When we actually did the traverse, the stages proved to be superfluous. With good fills in our 104s we could have done the dive well within limits without the extra 80 cubes.
When I finally get to move to Floridaone of the first dives I plan to make is Peacock. I want to see the crypt, some of the tunnels north of the crossover and maybe do a traverse to P3. Plus I have to recover my lost duck (probably stuck to the ceiling somewhere). http://cavediver.net/phpbb2/viewtopi...=asc&highlight


one of the first dives I plan to make is Peacock. I want to see the crypt, some of the tunnels north of the crossover and maybe do a traverse to P3. Plus I have to recover my lost duck (probably stuck to the ceiling somewhere).
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks