Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
Closed Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50
  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, Ft White
    Posts
    315

    Default

    On the face of it, these are in fact true statements. However I can't tell if you are are serious with this post given the context - you realize at least two of the divers are active cave instructors right? I'm not sure from whom they should take a refresher?

    Quote Originally Posted by inverted_bear View Post
    If you can't dive without messing up the cave then you have no business going into that environment in the first place.

    I can definitely appreciate the distance factor, but they should take a refresher if their skills are really that rusty.


  2. #12
    Honorary Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SE Coast of Arizona
    Age
    67
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyC View Post
    Anybody know what's going on here? This facebook page (which seems to have been created VERY recently, coincidence?) is accusing Mel Clark and her local guide (Rob Bartlett from Protec) of bypassing a physical barrier and some signage at a cenote to gain access to an archeological site. It also implies that they messed with some artifacts.

    https://www.facebook.com/Patrimonio-...8418432298568/

    Go down a couple posts to see where the accusatory post lies. I saw the linked post in the "Cave Diving Permanent Line" facebook group.

    Is anybody able to get to the bottom of this? Smell-o-scope is detecting something amiss here....
    Text from the quoted link, posted by "Patrimonio Cultural Sumergido de México en Tulum, Quintana Roo" shared their photo.: "

    WHAT motivates a "highly educated" and "highly qualified" foreign cave diver/instructor to break the law in México by penetrating Hoyo Negro illegally?
    WHAT motivates her to come to a foreign country and sneak in under a protective fence like a felon?
    WHAT motivates her to go past two signs that read NO ENTRY in both English and Spanish?
    WHAT motivates her to go right by a group of INAH researchers standing by at the surface?
    WHAT motivates her to keep on descending when she finds two research divers decompressing in her path that signal her to exit this Mexico/World heritage prehistoric archaeological site?
    WHAT motivates her to have possibly disturbed artifacts in prior illegal entries to the site?

    This "WOMEN HALL OF FAME" diver is Dr. MELANIE CLARK, originally from Canada now living in Washington State, USA.

    https://nsscds.org/instructor-bios/mel-clark/
    http://www.silentscuba.com/about/mel-clark/
    http://www.wdhof.org/memberroster/memberroster1.shtml
    [email protected]
    Some questions:
    Did they have permission to dive there, from appropriate authorities, who did not communicate the same to the "Patrimonio Cultural Sumergido de México en Tulum, Quintana Roo" or those others that are working there?

    It would not be the first time the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.

    Last edited by Jax; 11-17-2016 at 07:23 PM. Reason: Clarification
    Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt

    "If a small thing has the power to make you angry, does that not indicate something about your size?" ~Sydney J. Harris

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Roaming in cenote land
    Posts
    1,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jax View Post
    Text from the quoted link, posted by "Patrimonio Cultural Sumergido de México en Tulum, Quintana Roo" shared their photo.: "



    Some questions:


    It would not be the first time the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.
    From what i understand, its permit only by INAH and rebreathers only to not dislodge sediment that would end up on the artifacts while they do their research work.


  4. #14

    Default

    None of this surprises me in the least. I suspect that the accusations are true as there was money involved to gain access.


  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    4,616

    Default

    My understanding is the accusations are accurate. The reason for the choice to Internet shame is that this is one of multiple times that this archaeological site was dove without permission ( not necessarily by those people so don't take that as the same people have done this multiple times).

    I'm also to understand that this is a true archaeological site. Not bs archaeology like the stuff going on in chan hol where amateur archaeologists are leaving markers all over the place and disturbing artifacts and damaging the cave.


  6. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    south Georgia
    Posts
    7,398

    Default

    Got to wonder with current political climate between US and Mexico over the "wall" and immigrants, if a US citizen trespassing on closed property may meet a surprising response. A call to a US consulate, hefty fine, and less a baggage fee due to a confiscated rebreather could be possible. We don't have details,but I would sure do my homework when the guide is taking me to a "special " site, if this under government control.

    "Not all change is improvement...but all improvement is change" Donald Berwick

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    4,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelly Jessop View Post
    Got to wonder with current political climate between US and Mexico over the "wall" and immigrants, if a US citizen trespassing on closed property may meet a surprising response. A call to a US consulate, hefty fine, and less a baggage fee due to a confiscated rebreather could be possible. We don't have details,but I would sure do my homework when the guide is taking me to a "special " site, if this under government control.
    You can't assume this was a guide pushing to take someone to a special place. The blame is equal on all parties regardless of if it was a guide taking them somewhere cool or a guest specifically asking to go there. When you see the signs and the gate and you continue, you deserve to pay restitution, a fine, and a big thump on the head with a hammer.
    I'm a huge proponent of Protec so it really bothers me that one of their employees was involved. On the same token my experiences with Rob have been very very different than that of the professionalism of the rest of the Protec group. I'm hoping, as I suspect, it's just one idiot employee doing something stupid. I hope that he'll be dealt with locally by his employers.


  8. #18
    Special Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Gulf Breeze, FL
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Here in the US this can be very serious....https://www.nps.gov/archeology/tools/laws/arpa.htm

    "With regard to cave diving, the great thing is to be carried where you could not have imagined you would ever be, and then to come back alive."

    "Wilderness. The word itself is music." Abbey, Desert Solitaire

  9. #19
    Honorary Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SE Coast of Arizona
    Age
    67
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    There may not BE any blame.

    Mel Clark may have had permission to dive there. Just because those who are there didn't know about it, means nothing.

    Just a thought.

    Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt

    "If a small thing has the power to make you angry, does that not indicate something about your size?" ~Sydney J. Harris

  10. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Greenville, SC, USA
    Posts
    1,008

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wingman View Post
    Here in the US this can be very serious....https://www.nps.gov/archeology/tools/laws/arpa.htm
    I grew up in Central America, and it's a big deal there as well. There are two reasons for it being so serious in those countries: 1) Legitimate concerns for preservation. 2) There's a lot of money to be made in bribes surrounding these sites. I hope this all resolves smoothly for all involved because it could certainly get ugly.



 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2016, 09:01 PM
  2. Trouble with Avatars
    By Superlyte27 in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 10:52 AM
  3. Reading will get you in trouble
    By curtschu in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-21-2005, 08:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts