Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Neptune Beach, FL
    Posts
    3,300

    Default Nestle Continues Stealing World’s Water During Drought

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1427546115.560172.jpg
Views:	207
Size:	51.9 KB
ID:	12431

    The Arrowhead Mountain Water Company bottling plant, owned by Swiss conglomerate Nestle, on the Morongo Indian Reservation near Cabazon, Calif. Photo credit: Damian Dovarganes/AP.

    The city of Sacramento is in the fourth year of a record drought – yet the Nestlé Corporation continues to bottle city water to sell back to the public at a big profit, local activists charge.

    The Nestlé Water Bottling Plant in Sacramento is the target of a major press conference on Tuesday, March 17, by a water coalition that claims the company is draining up to 80 million gallons of water a year from Sacramento aquifers during the drought.

    The coalition, the crunchnestle alliance, says that City Hall has made this use of the water supply possible through a “corporate welfare giveaway,” according to a press advisory.

    A coalition of environmentalists, Native Americans and other concerned people announced the press conference will take place at March 17 at 5 p.m. at new Sacramento City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento.

    The coalition will release details of a protest on Friday, March 20, at the South Sacramento Nestlé plant designed to “shut down” the facility. The coalition is calling on Nestlé to pay rates commensurate with their enormous profit, or voluntarily close down.

    “The coalition is protesting Nestlé’s virtually unlimited use of water – up to 80 million gallons a year drawn from local aquifers – while Sacramentans (like other Californians) who use a mere 7 to 10 percent of total water used in the State of California, have had severe restrictions and limitations forced upon them,”

    according to the coalition.

    “Nestlé pays only 65 cents for each 470 gallons it pumps out of the ground – the same rate as an average residential water user. But the company can turn the area’s water around, and sell it back to Sacramento at mammoth profits,”

    the coalition said.

    Activists say that Sacramento officials have refused attempts to obtain details of Nestlé’s water used. Coalition members have addressed the Sacramento City Council and requested that Nestle’ either pay a commercial rate under a two tier level, or pay a tax on their profit.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1427546180.566458.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	306.4 KB
ID:	12432

    In October, the coalition released a “White Paper” highlighting predatory water profiteering actions taken by Nestle’ Water Bottling Company in various cities, counties, states and countries. Most of those great “deals” yielded mega profits for Nestle’ at the expense of citizens and taxpayers. Additionally, the environmental impact on many of those areas yielded disastrous results.

    Coalition spokesperson Andy Conn said,

    “This corporate welfare giveaway is an outrage and warrants a major investigation. For more than five months we have requested data on Nestlé water use. City Hall has not complied with our request, or given any indication that it will. Sacramentans deserve to know how their money is being spent and what they’re getting for it. In this case, they’re getting ripped off.”

    For more information about the crunchnestle alliance, contact Andy Conn (530) 906-8077 camphgr55 (at) gmail.com or Bob Saunders (916) 370-8251

    Nestlé is currently the leading supplier of the world’s bottled water, including such brands as Perrier and San Pellegrino, and has been criticized by activists for human rights violations throughout the world. For example, Food and Water Watch and other organizations blasted Nestlé’s “Human Rights Impact Assessment” in December 2013 as a “public relations stunt.”

    “The failure to examine Nestlé’s track record on the human right to water is not surprising given recent statements by its chair Peter Brabeck challenging the human right to water,” said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Watch. She noted that the company famously declared at the 2000 World Water Forum in the Netherlands that water should be defined as a need—not as a human right.

    “In November 2013, Colombian trade unionist Oscar Lopez Trivino became the fifteenth Nestlé worker to be assassinated by a paramilitary organization while many of his fellow workers were in the midst of a hunger strike protesting the corporation’s refusal to hear their grievances,”

    according to the groups.

    The press conference and protest will take place just days after Jay Famiglietti, the senior water scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech and a professor of Earth system science at UC Irvine, revealed in an op-ed in the LA Times on March 12 that California has only one year of water supply left in its reservoirs.

    “As difficult as it may be to face, the simple fact is that California is running out of water — and the problem started before our current drought. NASA data reveal that total water storage in California has been in steady decline since at least 2002, when satellite-based monitoring began, although groundwater depletion has been going on since the early 20th century.

    Right now the state has only about one year of water supply left in its reservoirs, and our strategic backup supply, groundwater, is rapidly disappearing. California has no contingency plan for a persistent drought like this one (let alone a 20-plus-year mega-drought), except, apparently, staying in emergency mode and praying for rain.”

    Meanwhile, Governor Jerry Brown continues to fast-track his Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) to build the peripheral tunnels to ship Sacramento River water to corporate agribusiness, Southern California water agencies, and oil companies conducting fracking operations. The $67 billion plan won’t create one single drop of new water, but it will take vast tracts of Delta farm land out of production under the guise of “habitat restoration” in order to irrigate drainage-impaired soil owned by corporate mega-growers on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.

    The tunnel plan will also hasten the extinction of Sacramento River Chinook salmon, Central Valley steelhead, Delta and longfin smelt, green sturgeon and other fish species, as well as imperil the salmon and steelhead populations on the Klamath and Trinity rivers. The peripheral tunnels will be good for agribusiness, water privateers, oil companies and the 1 percent, but will be bad for the fish, wildlife, people and environment of California and the public trust.

    The Delta smelt may already be extinct in the wild!

    In fact, the endangered Delta smelt, once the most abundant fish in the entire Bay Delta Estuary, may already be extinct, according to UC Davis fish biologist and author Peter Moyle, as quoted on Capital Public Radio.

    “Prepare for the extinction of the Delta Smelt in the wild,” Moyle told a group of scientists with the Delta Stewardship Council.

    According to Capital Public Radio:

    “He says the latest state trawl survey found very few fish in areas of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta where smelt normally gather.

    ‘That trawl survey came up with just six smelt, four females and two males,’ says Moyle. “Normally because they can target smelt, they would have gotten several hundred.’

    Moyle says the population of Delta smelt has been declining for the last 30 years but the drought may have pushed the species to the point of no return. If the smelt is officially declared extinct, which could take several years, the declaration could change how water is managed in California.

    ‘All these biological opinions on Delta smelt that have restricted some of the pumping will have to be changed,’ says Moyle.

    But Moyle says pumping water from the Delta to Central and Southern California could still be restricted at certain times because of all the other threatened fish populations.”

    The Delta smelt, an indicator species that demonstrates the health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, reached a new record low population level in 2014, according to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s fall midwater trawl survey that was released in January.

    Department staff found a total of only eight smelt at a total of 100 sites sampled each month from September through December

    The smelt is considered an indicator species because the 2.0 to 2.8 inch long fish is endemic to the estuary and spends all of its life in the Delta.

    The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has conducted the Fall Midwater Trawl Survey (FMWT) to index the fall abundance of pelagic (open water) fish, including Delta smelt, striped bass, longfin smelt, threadfin shad and American shad, nearly annually since 1967. The index of each species is a number that indicates a relative population abundance.

    Watch Nestle’s CEO declare water “food that should

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/nestle-...rought/5438880


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    "Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in event of success."

    Earnest Shackleton

  2. #2
    Moderator CDF-STAFF Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The World's Most Beautiful Beaches?
    Age
    67
    Posts
    12,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tflaris View Post
    “Nestlé pays only 65 cents for each 470 gallons it pumps out of the ground – the same rate as an average residential water user. But the company can turn the area’s water around, and sell it back to Sacramento at mammoth profits,”
    If people stopped paying a dollar (sometimes much more) for twenty ounces of water, then Nestlé would quit doing this.

    Whoever said money can't buy love never bought a puppy.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    High Springs
    Posts
    620

    Default

    I don't work for Nestle, but they did invite me to an interview a few years back. Just a couple points.

    >Managing our water resourses is a huge issue. We need to cooperate with corporations (Like Nestle). Now irresponsibly tapping water from a specific source is another matter. Diverting springs can lead to many issues. (as this article points out)

    >Most bottles beverages are wll over 90% water, so singleing out bottled water shows a lack of understanding.

    >Almost any packaged beverage you buy (other than water) requires fill lines to be flushed. So, If your going to drink a store bought bottled bevereage, purified drinking water is actually less wastefill than most other options.

    >If you fill your nalgene with tap water, AND wash it out on a regular basis, you are actually wasting a lot more water than is typically used for fill and discharged during the process of beverage bottling.

    >I think the author's heart is in the right place. I just think there are a lot better ways to improve the water issue. Outlaw St Augastine grass, in favor of drought tollerant grass like Zoita. Many other areas where we could improve. Excessive sprinkler coverage. Leaking pools etc. I know several places in the Orlando area that should be avoided by motorcycles and convertibles because they sprinkers are spraying more water on the street thant he grass.


  4. #4
    Honorary Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SE Coast of Arizona
    Age
    67
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Let's be real.

    Nestle isn't breaking laws. As much as you disagree with what is happening in the world, YOU are part of the problem to label this "stealing".

    Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt

    "If a small thing has the power to make you angry, does that not indicate something about your size?" ~Sydney J. Harris

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Eustis, FL
    Posts
    1,901

    Default

    Agree with Jax. Using words like "stealing" when what they are doing is completely lawful just makes you look like a nutcase. More than anything it kills your credibility for people who might have been on the fence about the issue.


  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    High Springs
    Posts
    620

    Default

    There was another similar story that made it sound like water from the southwest was being bottled and moved to other parts of the country. No doubt, Nestle has a distsribution system, but I can promise you they are very regionalized. I am in the industry and there are definately opportunities to improve resource conservation. Stories like this just fan the flames of anti-corporate sentiment and really solve nothing.

    I really don't have a dog in this particular fight. I don't work for or care much about Nestle or it's subsidiaries.

    Its good to raise awareness about water quality and resource conservation. 'Just have to be wary of activists who are just looking to sling mud for self promotion and not solve any real issues.

    Critical thinking skills are lacking in today's world. IMHO


  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    south Georgia
    Posts
    7,397

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adler View Post
    I don't work for Nestle, but they did invite me to an interview a few years back. Just a couple points.

    >Managing our water resourses is a huge issue. We need to cooperate with corporations (Like Nestle). Now irresponsibly tapping water from a specific source is another matter. Diverting springs can lead to many issues. (as this article points out)

    >Most bottles beverages are wll over 90% water, so singleing out bottled water shows a lack of understanding.

    >Almost any packaged beverage you buy (other than water) requires fill lines to be flushed. So, If your going to drink a store bought bottled bevereage, purified drinking water is actually less wastefill than most other options.

    >If you fill your nalgene with tap water, AND wash it out on a regular basis, you are actually wasting a lot more water than is typically used for fill and discharged during the process of beverage bottling.

    >I think the author's heart is in the right place. I just think there are a lot better ways to improve the water issue. Outlaw St Augastine grass, in favor of drought tollerant grass like Zoita. Many other areas where we could improve. Excessive sprinkler coverage. Leaking pools etc. I know several places in the Orlando area that should be avoided by motorcycles and convertibles because they sprinkers are spraying more water on the street thant he grass.
    You bring up some good points. Where it is popular to vilify Nestle, they have done more for protecting water quality, the springshed etc than most do, especially government. You mention that most beverages have 90% water, my understanding that to make a can of Coca Cola, it takes another 1/4 of that can in water for the process. There is a Miller brewing plant not far away, and they are huge consumers of water,but fly under the radar screen because it is beer. If we want to look at some of the largest wasters of water, look at some of the huge center pivots when traveling in North Florida. Many don't use water conservation spray heads, and they operate at the height of the day when over 50% goes to evaporation.

    "Not all change is improvement...but all improvement is change" Donald Berwick

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    High Springs
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelly Jessop View Post
    ... Many don't use water conservation spray heads, and they operate at the height of the day when over 50% goes to evaporation.
    Right on point, Kelly. When I lived in Winter Garden, they would patrol the neighborhoods issuing tickets for off-day watering, but never had issue with time of day. I would run my sprinklers for just an hour at ~4am. Back in ~05 our HOA mandated St Augastine. We had to replace that stupid grass 3 times. Now HOAs cannot require that, but people still use tons of water and insectacide trying to keep that grass alive. In those days, I managed a distribution center over near OBT. In 4 years, not one city official ever stopped by to check on our sprinkler usage. We kept it at a minimum (because I am just a cheapskate by nature), but I drive past comercial properties all the time with off-time and poor irrigation setups.

    On the topic of Beverages, you are correct (for the most part) on 25% waste above the bottled capacity. I laugh when I hear people comlain about how great returnable glass bottles were. Ha! The water rinse/waste was well over 50% in that process. Sure the current PET bottles creates a waste stream, but PET is one of the highest % recycled products out there. And using the PET actually uses less water rinse waste than your nalgene or the old returnable bottles. Don't get me started on all the foreign objects found in returnables that the 'rinsing' process did not clean out.

    This is a complex issue. To make significant improvements in resource conservation, we need open dialogue and new ideas to really be better stewards of our environment.

    Just a thought, but I was down in the Keys a few months ago. At least in Cudjoe and Big Pine, they are working to remove septic tanks and install sewage lines and water treatment. Our Real Estate agent told us it was going to cost each home owner 2-3k oop for the conversion. I know housing in the keys is much more concentrated than near the Suanee/SanteFe rivers, but I would welcome this type of improvement. I think most money spent on "Awareness"' campaigns is wasted feel good stuff. I would rather see our tax money spend on real solutions that will help clean up our water.


  9. #9

    Default

    Sounds like the government has once again failed to central plan resources effectively. This isn't news.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Neptune Beach, FL
    Posts
    3,300

    Default

    http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/...?detail=email#


    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed that is the only thing that ever has."
    - Margaret Mead, Anthropologist

    "Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in event of success."

    Earnest Shackleton


 

Similar Threads

  1. Ocean water is answer to drought
    By tflaris in forum Environmental Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-17-2014, 05:37 AM
  2. Nestlé recognised for leadership on water and deforestation
    By tflaris in forum Environmental Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-13-2014, 04:54 PM
  3. Nestlé opens its most water efficient factory in Mexico
    By tflaris in forum Environmental Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-25-2014, 12:58 AM
  4. Nestle backs out of pumping water from the Wacissa
    By SuPrBuGmAn in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-29-2011, 12:37 PM
  5. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-10-2010, 01:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts