While I can't comment on ACTUALLY why the rule was originally posited, I can offer a probable basis.
Sheck and other early cave divers, after reviewing fatalities and incidents surrounding this sport came to understand empiracally, human nature.
In analyzing incidents especially incidents involving exceeding training, a baseline of human nature can be drawn. We are creatures of habit - good and bad. We tend towards routinization and route patterns. Our complacency springs from familiarization and repetition, and in that acclimatization to cutting corners when there is no perceived consequence, we all fall prey. We will repeat bad behavior when there appears to be no harm to us.
Simple Traverses will INEVITABLY lead to complex ones. ITS HUMAN NATURE.
Even the knowledge that Olsen is "right there" doesn't change that it is a blind traverse the first time -despite being attested to by divers and maps... Peacock is easy... See?
We made it- GREAT! that's not so hard... Next challenge....
No traverses means no traverses. No chance for the human nature to begin the slippery slope towards complacency and acclimatization.
I think it's a rule worth keeping.
Dan-O
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks