I agree. I really don't see how this issue "protects the privilege," which is the topic of this thread.
But to finish the issue, if you believe an instructor was guilty of some sort of infraction and should be expelled from the agency, but nothing happens, it does not mean that the agency turned a blind eye. It cold instead mean:
1. The agency investigated and found that the charges were false
2. The agency investigated and determined that there was some truth to the matter, but not such that it merited expulsion. In some cases instructor receive additional training to get them back in the groove, or they are briefly suspended.
3. The agency investigated and found the charges to be true but differs with you on whether the charges merit expulsion. For example, there are a lot of people with criminal records holding a lot of jobs around the world. Being convicted of a crime does not mean you can never hold a job again as long as you live. Whether or not a crime unrelated to scuba has anything to do with your ability to teach a class depends upon the situation and is a matter of opinion.
John, Kelly,
Why hearsay 1st, 2nd or third hand does not count. If someone overheard either of you say, lets eat Grandma! They'd think you were the guy with the chianti bottle and the fava beans.
If what you actually said was lets eat, Grandma! The world would see you as a nice young man!
/Ken Hill
“Reason is not automatic. Those that deny it cannot be conquered by it.” Ayn Rand
Bookmarks