Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 21 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 205
  1. #131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy
    There experts failed to mention the spring cave under the land.

    Thanks drew and I have been in touch with Buford and I am not confused. Cindy
    OK, just checking, you wouldn't be the first to get them mixed up (like I did).

    Drew


  2. #132

    Default

    As I understand it the Distribution Center is the spot where hundreds of trucks will stop then off and on load every week. There they will be washed and fueled and maintained. All leading to groundwater and run off issues.

    From reading the testimony at the hearing, the ground issues will be addressed by "grouting" the limestone to prevent sinks from forming. Other than the grout there is no plan in place for a barrier of any sort to stop the surface conditions from leaching in the cave. I am glad there are enough cave divers savvy in the ways of engineering to interpret what is being done since professional assistance seems to be out of the question.

    The irony of the matter is that the cave sits on En Ess Ess owned land and is still zoned as commercial when it should have had a conservation easement placed on it years ago.

    Regards. /Ken
    Regards
    /Ken


  3. #133
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern KY
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,071

    Default

    Do you know if that topic was ever broached prior to now Ken (establishing a conservation easement)? If so, what became of it; did it just die off for lack of interest or what? If not, why? It seems to me that would be one of the first things done (or should be at least) once proerty such as this is purchased by a non-profit whose main mission is to conserve such lands. I guess what I am asking here is did the ball get dropped or did nobody ever bother to toss it out into play? Thanks for all your input on this matter.

    DeWayne

    The safest way to dive solo is to refuse to dive with an idiot. - Dave Sutton


    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce (1906, Devil's Dictionary)

  4. #134
    Genesis
    Guest

    Default

    Online petitions (that automatically fax the people you want faxed) are easy - I specialize in them.

    Contact me off the forum.


  5. #135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeWayne
    Do you know if that topic was ever broached prior to now Ken (establishing a conservation easement)?
    I can say I brought it up numerous times within the past two years and that as far as Mill Creek Sink, the matter stopped at the door of the enn **s **s AVP.

    This idea for our property protection came at the suggestion of the Florida real estate lawyer that helped us on the closing of the Cow and School Sink parcels. I can't say, but I don't think those were done either since just after that another lawyer from another state is lending his expertise.

    /Ken


  6. #136
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern KY
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,071

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Hill
    I can say I brought it up numerous times within the past two years and that as far as Mill Creek Sink, the matter stopped at the door of the enn **s **s AVP.

    This idea for our property protection came at the suggestion of the Florida real estate lawyer that helped us on the closing of the Cow and School Sink parcels. I can't say, but I don't think those were done either since just after that another lawyer from another state is lending his expertise.

    /Ken
    I meant to ask about those other two as well, glad you thought to mention them. What all is involved in getting such as this accomplished?

    DeWayne

    The safest way to dive solo is to refuse to dive with an idiot. - Dave Sutton


    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce (1906, Devil's Dictionary)

  7. #137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeWayne
    I meant to ask about those other two as well, glad you thought to mention them. What all is involved in getting such as this accomplished?
    From what I recall from the Attorney, it will involve filing a deed restriction limiting the land for conservation use only. A fairly simple procedure and one not likely to be challenged by the surrounding land owners since it is so benign.

    You can read the Florida statute at: http://www.wildlaw.org/easements/704-06.html

    Some elements of this process include:

    704.06 Conservation easements; creation; acquisition; enforcement.--

    (1) As used in this section, "conservation easement" means a right or interest in real property which is appropriate to retaining land or water areas predominantly in their natural, scenic, open, agricultural, or wooded condition; retaining such areas as suitable habitat for fish, plants, or wildlife; retaining the structural integrity or physical appearance of sites or properties of historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance; or maintaining existing land uses and which prohibits or limits any or all of the following:

    (a) Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities, or other structures on or above the ground.

    more........

    (2) Conservation easements are perpetual, undivided interests in property and may be created or stated in the form of a restriction, easement, covenant, or condition in any deed, will, or other instrument executed by or on behalf of the owner of the property, or in any order of taking. more ..........

    (3) Conservation easements may be acquired by any governmental body or agency or by a charitable corporation or trust whose purposes include protecting natural, scenic, or open space values of real property, assuring its availability for agricultural, forest, recreational, or open space use, protecting natural resources, maintaining or enhancing air or water quality, or preserving sites or properties of historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance. more .......

    (4) Conservation easements shall run with the land and be binding on all subsequent owners of the servient estate. No conservation easement shall be unenforceable on account of lack of privity of contract or lack of benefit to particular land or on account of the benefit being assignable. more.......


    (5) All conservation easements shall be recorded and indexed in the same manner as any other instrument affecting the title to real property.

    (6) The provisions of this section shall not be construed to imply that any restriction, easement, covenant, or condition which does not have the benefit of this section shall, on account of any provision hereof, be unenforceable.

    (7) Recording of the conservation easement shall be notice to the property appraiser and tax collector of the county of the conveyance of the conservation easement.

    (8) Conservation easements may provide for a third-party right of enforcement. As used in this section, third-party right of enforcement means a right provided in a conservation easement to enforce any of its terms granted to a governmental body, or charitable corporation or trust as described in subsection (3), which although eligible to be a holder, is not a holder.

    ****see my note****

    (9) An action affecting a conservation easement may be brought by:

    (a) An owner of an interest in the real property burdened by the easement;

    (b) A holder of the easement;

    (c) A person having a third-party right of enforcement; or

    (d) A person authorized by another law.

    (10) The ownership or attempted enforcement of rights held by the holder of an easement does not subject the holder to any liability for any damage or injury that may be suffered by any person on the property or as a result of the condition of the property encumbered by a conservation easement.

    (11) Nothing in this section or other provisions of law shall be construed to prohibit or limit the owner of land, or the owner of a conservation easement over land, to voluntarily negotiate the sale or utilization of such lands or easement for the construction and operation of linear facilities,

    more ........
    ____________________________________________

    **** Note****

    With reference to #8. This provision would require the ENN ESS ESS or the SEE DEE ESS to name a third party (not for profit) to enforce the conservation easement should either of these two orgs disband or lose ownership due to litigation. That would mean "trusting" another not for profit cave organization with the fate of your asset in the event your orgs were no longer in the picture.

    Its late.

    /Ken


  8. #138
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gainesville
    Posts
    1,387

    Default

    Hey Ken, there are two groups right now that work with environmental easements. The land over the upstream portion of the cave is already protected, that was done by the Alachua Conservation Trust. The Karst Conservancy also will set up and manage environmental easements. If we could get the land owner to go along with prtecting the portion downstream it would be great but I think you are shooting in the dark on that one. They know that the easement you are talking about would ruin the chance of selling the land to Wal Mart. Cindy

    "Philosophy is a purely personal matter. A genuine philosopher's credo is the outcome of a single complex personality; it cannot be transferred. No two persons, if sincere, can have the same philosophy."
    --Havelock Ellis

  9. #139

    Default

    Cindy,

    Good morning. The Mill Creek Sink parcel that we own is still zoned commercial. That's the land I was referring too. How can we ask others to take conservation measures seriously when we ourselves have not taken the full advantage of the law to protect what we own.

    I am glad to hear the Alachua Conservation Trust and the Karst Conservancy also will help. /K


    Reference:
    http://www.acpafl.org/ParcelResults....66%2D002%2D001


  10. #140
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gainesville
    Posts
    1,387

    Default

    Hey Ken, It doesn't matter if the NSS does not intend to sell the site since they are a conservation based organization. I know it was at one point suggested to them to sell the site to the CDS but I don't think that happened. For now this only makes muddy water to switch subjects like this. What I would really like to see you look up is spring laws and critter protection laws so I can put those down in the petition I am going to form. I need info related to saving the cave right now. We can worry about the rest later, Cindy

    "Philosophy is a purely personal matter. A genuine philosopher's credo is the outcome of a single complex personality; it cannot be transferred. No two persons, if sincere, can have the same philosophy."
    --Havelock Ellis


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts