Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Spartanburg, SC
    Age
    59
    Posts
    857

    Default Forget the CDS for a moment. Is there a problem with the level of cave training?

    Chris intentions were good with his survey. Before we find a solution I believe that consensus of a problem and understanding the problem is needed. My perception is that overall cave diver training is on an increasingly steeper slide downward in quality. I also believe that this downward slide will eventually lead to loosing site access, negative public perception, and possible government intervention and/or control.

    Now having put this issue on the table it needs to be backed up with substance. I no longer teach diving and the reason is that I came to believe I could not make what I felt was sufficient impact on new divers through teaching. The cause for this shift was the influx of so many new technical instructors that had less expensive classes, that took less time, and passed most of their students the first time through. My classes were more expensive not because I depended on them for a living but because the time and effort required to do them deserves a reasonable ROI (Return on Investment). They took more time because they were taught to a level that ensured that the student understood their limitations and why they should seek additional training after gaining experience at their present level instead of just meeting minimum standards. Many required more time to acquire the skills and understanding than the standard time frame of the class.

    Ten years ago when talking to a diver fresh out of completing cave training (full cave) they easily could explain why they carry line arrows and non-directional markers. Over the last ten years the trend has gone from finding the odd few that didn't know to now a majority don't have that understanding. Today most have difficulty planning a simple circuit such as P1 to Peanut via the Cross Over tunnel. Lately I have had conversations with instructors that could not plan that circuit properly. This is not exaggeration or second hand stories, this is from conversations and questions I have asked directly.

    Since getting out of teaching I have also refined how I guide. Now my guiding is also mentoring and I turn down all other guiding unless it is geared towards mentoring. I also have narrowed down the mentoring to two main areas which are actual SM passage and extended range CCR. I don't advertise and turn down the majority of requests I receive. This leaves a rather small population of potential divers to work with which trend towards having more experience than a newly certified cave diver (full cave). Today virtually every person that I do work with in a guiding/mentoring capacity needs to learn using directional & non-directional markers, tie off techniques, jump techniques, etc. before we can start working on the stuff that they are paying me to help them with. I won't go into a SM jump has a high potential for being silted out due to the small size of the passage with a diver that can't easily and properly deploy their reel/spool, tie off, and find their way in zero visibility. If they can't securely put the jump in to ensure we have a continuous line that isn't going to come loose or be confusing on which way to exit then they surely won't be going into tight difficult passage with me.

    Now most have seen in other posts that I have turned instructors in for standards violations. Don't bother asking because I am not going to call out names for the person or the agency. Besides violating TOS it is also bad form. I am not the scuba police and there is a process to handle these issues. If the agencies that set the standards are not going to do the job I will not be Don Quixote or go vigilante. That being said the standards violations that I have seen, and many many more that I have heard from students, are IMO criminal. We have instructors regularly taking students into cave passage without a line and doing drills. Instructors taking students on blind jumps. Instructors teaching above ratio which BTW all org.s for all technical diving max out at 3 students in the water period. If there are 4 students under water with one instructor if is violating standards. Instructors allowing students to enter systems without running a primary reel from open water. I can go on and on, the reality is that this has become the norm for to many instructors and students don't know what they don't know. This is on top of how quickly and with how little prior dive experience students are being accepted to begin their cave training and instructor candidates are being accepted to become cave instructors.

    When I started cave diving instructors were not allowed to commercially promote themselves. If someone was seeking to dive in caves and sought out teaching then instructors stepped forward and provided their services. Today cave instructors actively recruit and promote that divers get into and start cave diving. It may be a fine line however IMO that line is distinctive and should be firmly held.

    The issue that we have is that the vast majority of divers have no idea if their training was good, bad. or ugly. The way the training is now it also has divers regularly diving over their training and promoting others to do the same. Most Basic Cave divers are quickly diving past sixths, often doing jumps, and a rather large number are even doing circuits. Lets not even get into how many are doing all of those things and will not continue through their training because the fact that their card expires really doesn't mean jack because they are rarely checked and when they are most don't pay any attention to the expiration date on the card.

    The IUCRR unfortunately has not kept up to date with statistics and trends. Just looking at the out of date data clearly shows that the tide has turned completely from the most incidents being untrained divers to present day of trained divers being the leader in incidents. We have more divers seeking training and have done a good job of informing the OW diver of the dangers with going into a cave without it. If there were no problem with our training then the number of trained divers dieing in caves would not increase with the number of people being trained. I know this sounds counter intuitive but in general this is how it it should work. We would have a few medical issues and a few outliers every year but regardless of how many are trained those numbers would hold within a normal range over the years. The reality that we have reduced the number of OW diver incidents to a level range while more OW divers get trained as well as more and more technical divers which more easily have access to caves without cave training should show that the range can be held. It is not and that to me clearly shows there is a problem with training.

    So what do others see? What are your thoughts on training? If there is a problem with training what are they? Calling out names or agencies is counter productive IMHO. Lets first get it out in the open what we are seeing and what is happening. If it was you that went through it then stand up and put it out there. If you have seen it do the same. I believe that we at least need to discuss this topic and hopefully get some consensus regarding if there is a problem and what types of problems there are.

    Bobby

    The Light Dude
    Innovation through exploration

    Local Zip Code Diver

  2. #2

    Default

    Right On Bobby.

    Jim Wyatt
    Cavediveflorida

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Florida
    Posts
    1,532

    Default

    Spot On.

    Dive safe,

    Celia

    "Work out your own salvation. Do not depend on others."
    ...Buddha

    ''Life's tough, pilgrim, and it’s even tougher if you're stupid.''
    - John Wayne

  4. #4

    Default

    I have no argument with the post. The mission of the IUCRR is to assist law enforcement and public safety agencies with the rescue or recovery of victims in an underwater environment. Law enforcement is the sole recipient of its reports, which is some cases become part of open investigations and therefore not public information. Recent laws, law suits, HIPPA and other regulations unfortunately has made this necessary.

    The IUCRR reserves the right in matters of diver safety to notify the Safety Officers of the NSS-CDS and NACD.

    /Ken Hill

    “Reason is not automatic. Those that deny it cannot be conquered by it.” Ayn Rand

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Spartanburg, SC
    Age
    59
    Posts
    857

    Default

    Ken,
    Thanks for your post. I understand the situation with the IUCRR, my intention was not to disparage the IUCRR. I simply wanted to show that though the data is dated it clearly shows the trend reversal and my belief that training is a likely input for the trend.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

    Bobby

    The Light Dude
    Innovation through exploration

    Local Zip Code Diver

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    1,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby View Post
    Chris intentions were good with his survey. Before we find a solution I believe that consensus of a problem and understanding the problem is needed. My perception is that overall cave diver training is on an increasingly steeper slide downward in quality. I also believe that this downward slide will eventually lead to loosing site access, negative public perception, and possible government intervention and/or control.

    Now having put this issue on the table it needs to be backed up with substance. I no longer teach diving and the reason is that I came to believe I could not make what I felt was sufficient impact on new divers through teaching. The cause for this shift was the influx of so many new technical instructors that had less expensive classes, that took less time, and passed most of their students the first time through. My classes were more expensive not because I depended on them for a living but because the time and effort required to do them deserves a reasonable ROI (Return on Investment). They took more time because they were taught to a level that ensured that the student understood their limitations and why they should seek additional training after gaining experience at their present level instead of just meeting minimum standards. Many required more time to acquire the skills and understanding than the standard time frame of the class.

    Ten years ago when talking to a diver fresh out of completing cave training (full cave) they easily could explain why they carry line arrows and non-directional markers. Over the last ten years the trend has gone from finding the odd few that didn't know to now a majority don't have that understanding. Today most have difficulty planning a simple circuit such as P1 to Peanut via the Cross Over tunnel. Lately I have had conversations with instructors that could not plan that circuit properly. This is not exaggeration or second hand stories, this is from conversations and questions I have asked directly.

    Since getting out of teaching I have also refined how I guide. Now my guiding is also mentoring and I turn down all other guiding unless it is geared towards mentoring. I also have narrowed down the mentoring to two main areas which are actual SM passage and extended range CCR. I don't advertise and turn down the majority of requests I receive. This leaves a rather small population of potential divers to work with which trend towards having more experience than a newly certified cave diver (full cave). Today virtually every person that I do work with in a guiding/mentoring capacity needs to learn using directional & non-directional markers, tie off techniques, jump techniques, etc. before we can start working on the stuff that they are paying me to help them with. I won't go into a SM jump has a high potential for being silted out due to the small size of the passage with a diver that can't easily and properly deploy their reel/spool, tie off, and find their way in zero visibility. If they can't securely put the jump in to ensure we have a continuous line that isn't going to come loose or be confusing on which way to exit then they surely won't be going into tight difficult passage with me.

    Now most have seen in other posts that I have turned instructors in for standards violations. Don't bother asking because I am not going to call out names for the person or the agency. Besides violating TOS it is also bad form. I am not the scuba police and there is a process to handle these issues. If the agencies that set the standards are not going to do the job I will not be Don Quixote or go vigilante. That being said the standards violations that I have seen, and many many more that I have heard from students, are IMO criminal. We have instructors regularly taking students into cave passage without a line and doing drills. Instructors taking students on blind jumps. Instructors teaching above ratio which BTW all org.s for all technical diving max out at 3 students in the water period. If there are 4 students under water with one instructor if is violating standards. Instructors allowing students to enter systems without running a primary reel from open water. I can go on and on, the reality is that this has become the norm for to many instructors and students don't know what they don't know. This is on top of how quickly and with how little prior dive experience students are being accepted to begin their cave training and instructor candidates are being accepted to become cave instructors.

    When I started cave diving instructors were not allowed to commercially promote themselves. If someone was seeking to dive in caves and sought out teaching then instructors stepped forward and provided their services. Today cave instructors actively recruit and promote that divers get into and start cave diving. It may be a fine line however IMO that line is distinctive and should be firmly held.

    The issue that we have is that the vast majority of divers have no idea if their training was good, bad. or ugly. The way the training is now it also has divers regularly diving over their training and promoting others to do the same. Most Basic Cave divers are quickly diving past sixths, often doing jumps, and a rather large number are even doing circuits. Lets not even get into how many are doing all of those things and will not continue through their training because the fact that their card expires really doesn't mean jack because they are rarely checked and when they are most don't pay any attention to the expiration date on the card.

    The IUCRR unfortunately has not kept up to date with statistics and trends. Just looking at the out of date data clearly shows that the tide has turned completely from the most incidents being untrained divers to present day of trained divers being the leader in incidents. We have more divers seeking training and have done a good job of informing the OW diver of the dangers with going into a cave without it. If there were no problem with our training then the number of trained divers dieing in caves would not increase with the number of people being trained. I know this sounds counter intuitive but in general this is how it it should work. We would have a few medical issues and a few outliers every year but regardless of how many are trained those numbers would hold within a normal range over the years. The reality that we have reduced the number of OW diver incidents to a level range while more OW divers get trained as well as more and more technical divers which more easily have access to caves without cave training should show that the range can be held. It is not and that to me clearly shows there is a problem with training.

    So what do others see? What are your thoughts on training? If there is a problem with training what are they? Calling out names or agencies is counter productive IMHO. Lets first get it out in the open what we are seeing and what is happening. If it was you that went through it then stand up and put it out there. If you have seen it do the same. I believe that we at least need to discuss this topic and hopefully get some consensus regarding if there is a problem and what types of problems there are.
    Bravo!


  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wakulla County, Florida
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Bobby you are right and I'm right there with you. I just eluded to some of the same issues in another Thread. Enforcement of standards or better yet consequences for violations is non existence. Too many of the "good" instructors stand by after witnessing violations and will not act placing their reputation over that of becoming involved. News flash! If you teach then any thing and everything that occurs in the teaching world directly contributes to your reputation as does it mine. There are things I am currently investigating against several instructors whom I do not even know. Is this my job as an instructor? No. It should be the job of the training director who received the complaint. Is it my responsibility to spare each and every unknowing student from possible injury or death? Certainly!! Just like it is every other instructors as a matter of standards and law. Law you ask? Yes law. Injure or cause the death of a student and see how fast you end up in a court of LAW!

    Instructors need to change their outlook on complaints and realize we all suffer each time we turn a cheek to getting involved. IMO this makes you just as bad as the instructor violating standards and should very well be a violation in itself. When will you as an instructor stop and say to yourself? "I should have done something" I can tell you when. When the student is dead and you allowed it to continue!!! Now ask yourself. Can I live knowing I could have prevented it?

    Thanks for bringing this up Bobby. It is the real problem we all face as instructors.


  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas / Florida
    Posts
    246

    Default

    While I agree with much of what Bobby wrote, some technical organizations allow 4 students per instructor to the trimix levels and some Cave training allows for up to 4 students per instructor to the Intro to Cave level. The statement that all training organizations max out at 3 students in the water is not factually accurate. While we may not necessarily agree with allowing those ratios, it is incorrect to state that those instructors who adhere to those ratios are violating standards. Exercising poor judgement, perhaps. Bobby is spot on concerning how easily organizations accept instructor candidates with minimal experience.

    Carl Griffing
    Cave and Technical Instructor
    http://caveandtechdiving.com

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Geneva Indiana
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Bobby great post.
    Solutions are able to come about with awareness.
    I am hopeful and believe in a bright future.

    JCG


  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Forsyth, GA
    Posts
    559

    Default

    Jim, nice to see you posting...

    In regards to our conversation the other day....

    From bottom of the main forum page as of right now on a Sunday

    "Most users ever online was 790, Yesterday at 10:20 AM.'

    You had expressed a concern that people are just stirring up stuff when they are at work, it they post on a weekend it would start to mean something...

    I think we are starting to have VERY important conversations, yours is a important voice in the conversation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wyatt View Post
    Right On Bobby.

    Chris Richardson


 

Similar Threads

  1. DR cave safety problem
    By phillip1 in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 05-31-2011, 10:25 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 09:16 PM
  3. Forget you o2 at Ginnie?
    By JahJahwarrior in forum Lost & Found
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 06:04 AM
  4. DON'T FORGET....
    By Kelly Jessop in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-26-2004, 03:05 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts