Does the term "tank envy" apply here![]()
Does the term "tank envy" apply here![]()
They are talking about the PST LP80. Giselle had a set, but we sold them when she found some 95s. Now that she is SM, we are questioning that decision.
Regardless, if PST had made LP85, they would have trimmed out similar to the Worthingtons anyways, since they are made using the same process which results in a thicker tank butt.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK
PST LP-80s are very negative compared to Fabers. I can dive a single with a 3mm full suit and no weight (in salt water). They are also much more abrasion-resistant compared to Fabers, which is why my instructor harped and harped about how hot-dilled galvanized cylinders are better in caves than zinc-sprayed.
From earlier posts, he is talking about LP-80s, which hold about 95% of what LP-85s hold.
Whoever said money can't buy love never bought a puppy.
Okay, I'm typing in a dark room, okay?
(The class is watching a video.)
Whoever said money can't buy love never bought a puppy.
I'm slowly moving in the direction of SM and I've got both PST 104's and PST 80's. From a SM perspective, how difficult would it be to trim out when switching between them?
You should not have much trouble switching between them. I was going between my PST 104s and some PST MP95 (weird tanks), without any changes in trim. I traded the MP95s in for some Worthington LP85, and don't expect difficulty with trim. I have not yet had a chance to dive the 85s.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK
All you old people and your 2500 tanks...I only have 20 and even doing my own VIP/cleaning it costs too much
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
I'm feeling inadequate - I only have 19 tanks, and half of them are Tracy's.
Bookmarks