Quote Originally Posted by jj1987 View Post
Actually Larry, I believe you said earlier in the thread that by allowing it as an access point, you felt that management (a gov organization) was poorly managing the resource.


Since this is an either or situation (allow access or not), if you believe that allowing access is poor management, that only leaves one conclusion-- you want the gov management to shut down access.
Ah... a single act by the state park - closing the entrance - is big government. Thanks for clarifying.

The thing is that even conservatives tend to agree that the role of government, at a minimum, is to do those things (and only those things) that individuals cannot do for themselves. If the park does not act to protect the area when/if it becomes apparent it is being damaged, what would you suggest?