Welcome to the Cave Diver's Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7
Results 61 to 63 of 63
  1. #61
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Benderr View Post
    I don't know the woman personally, but she has a clear bias against divers. There is an attachment that went with that letter, and she mentions that it was fortunate in the past, that divers had been injured during slow park periods because the air ambulances would have disrupted park activities otherwise.... I'm paraphrasing, but not embellishing.....
    It may be beneficial to talk with the woman in person, get her perspective and gently attempt a compromise with her. bringing opposition to your side, or at least putting a reasonable face on, goes a long way toward conflict resolution. Authorities are impressed when two factions reach an agreement/compromise.

    skip

    "Learning the techniques of others does not interfere with the discovery of techniques of one's own." B.F. Skinner, 1970.

  2. #62
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Age
    44
    Posts
    3,450

    Default

    Skip - there was cave diving representation at the Friends of Wakulla CSO meeting. Responses were negative, but atleast mostly polite it seems.


  3. #63
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    719

    Default

    Skip, someone else is handling that aspect of our project. From what I heard though, many folks on the other side are not willing to compromise, mostly because they feel like they don't have to compromise with us, or anyone else. It seems from my second-hand observations that they're not listening to our side (they HEAR what we say, but don't really LISTEN). There are some neutral folks sitting on the fence, and we ARE talking to them. There are some legitimate concerns, and I think everyone in the dive community are willing to compromise on those particular issues.

    Honestly, I think we'll get more traction with state representatives, especially if we don't get into a "wetsuit warming" match with the other side. We want to respectfully set the bosses straight, without being negative towards the other group and we want to focus on how both groups can benefit from our (diver) inclusion. That's why the suggested form letter centers mostly on the economic impacts diving can bring to the table, as we don't need 100 different divers giving the state a lecture on trimix diving or manatee conservation.

    That's why it's important to get other interested divers (and bulletin boards) involved in the letter writing. Every letter the State folks see, shows them that someone is interested in spending money at a state park, and ultimately, I think money will be what the decision will come down to.



 

Similar Threads

  1. Update On Peacock Springs State Park
    By divescsnow in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 07:18 PM
  2. Story on Blue Springs State Park
    By Cave Ranger in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-31-2007, 11:46 AM
  3. Emergency meeting Wakulla springs state park
    By Kelly Jessop in forum Conservation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-22-2006, 08:41 PM
  4. Troy Springs State Park
    By Janet in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 02:56 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-05-2005, 07:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts