In my job I get to see first hand what a) happens in congress where good congressional intent often goes horribly wrong, and then b) what happens in the regulatory process where that "intent" is often converted by a regulatory process into something much more far reaching and much more permanant than ever intended.
For example in this case "until it can be demonstrated that humans are not a vector" would in the abscence of any completed and more importantly approved and cleared research, become a de facto permanent ban.
I could see all caves getting drug into it as, to a bureaucrat, banning access to 'all caves on federal property" meets the congressional intent of protecting "all dry caves on federal property" without the need to make case by case detemrinations on what is a dry versus wet cave and developing differing methods of enforcement.
In the event the legislation does go forward, we would at a minimum want the legislation to sundown after X (1, 2, 3, 5?) years, or when the disease disease has already spread everywhere anyway and human vector concerns are no longer an issue, in order to cover the "no research ever gets done" and/or "it cannot be demonstrated that humans are not a vector" possibilities.
And more importantly for cave diving, we need to ensure that the legislation as enacted specifically excludes flooded caves in terms of both fully flooded caves and dry portions of caves where the entrance is flooded and where consequently no bats are present (other than plastic ones hanging from the ceiling.)



Reply With Quote
Semper Fi, Cameron David Smith, my son, my hero. 11/9/1989 - 11/13/2010 

Bookmarks