I used IFR flight analogies as well - the concepts of a very high level of situational awareness, staying ahead of the airplane and the much higher levels of planning and reserves lend themselves very well to cave diving. Having learned to fly in some of the more remote areas of the country, your alternate was often the same as your point of departure as no other suitable airfield was available - a concept that is very similar to cave diving and is in essence almost identical in concept to the rule of thirds.
My concerns with a cache however would be that a diver, feeling bolder than usual by the presence of the community cache, pushes his penetration with something like a 1/2 plus 200 gas planning schedule and then encounters a problem. Upon reaching the comunity cache he was counting on for his reserve, he discovers there is not one that day, or that the tanks are empty, or temporarily removed for maintence, or were just taken by a similarly minded team just ahead of him, etc, etc, etc. So, lacking any other options, he takes my stage bottle and leaves me in a situation where I am at best at the edge of my reserve, or at worst, if delayed by whatever delayed him, basically a dead man swimming because Mr. Piss Poor Planning just stole my gas.
When instrument flying I had all my own required gas and reserve aboard and no one was going to cut into that with inflight refueling etc. I'd like to ensure that remains the case in cave diving and I'd like assurance that if I leave a bottle in a cave for my use, it will remain there for my use. That concept gets a bit soft and squishy with the community cache idea where taking a botle that ain't yours is allowable in some circumstances.
I think for many reasons, a cache system would only work toward increasing safety in guided caves where the guide(s) knows what is what and keeps the gas planning reasonable - which also ensures the cached gas will never get used, so it is a wash and not worth the effort. In an unguided cave there are just more problems than benefits and in the end I don't think greater safety will result.
I usually swim in a two person team, and given that we both have low SACs and can achieve long penetrations and dives times on back gas, where a 1/3rd reserve is potentially marginal if the team loses half its total reserve gas, we carry a safety bottle to add what amounts to the reserve third from a third team member that is not included in the gas plan.
So I am not opposed to safety bottles, I am just opposed to creating the opportunity for people to become reliant on community stage bottles and start including them in their "oh ****, something went wrong" gas planning rather than using properly conservative and appropriate gas planning.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks