Organization Membership

Hahaha, fair enough

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tbone1004

pruning may have been the wrong choice of words due them all leaving voluntarily, but this is what I actually meant.

Pruning is the removal of dead and some live parts of a plant to stimulate healthy growth. MAG left on his own accord, he was a tremendous asset to the NACD as conservation director as was Zelda in operations, their separation is unfortunate, and I think while the timing is coincidental to the other two losses, they are somewhat independent.

---

That is an incorrect assumption.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Draker

Really? You think this is drama?

There has been no mention of illegal narcotics. No genitalia exposed. No handguns wielded.

No arrests have been made and no one has died in the process.

No caves have been closed or access blocked.

No 10 year olds were found diving in the cavern some and no recent gang bangs in a seedy motel room.

No one has been physically harmed or verbally threatened.

This recent nonsense hardly rates on the drama scale.

Just business as usual if you ask me.

---

Excellent point!


"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed that is the only thing that ever has."
- Margaret Mead, Anthropologist

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MichaelAngelo

That is an incorrect assumption.

---

thanks for the clarification, will be waiting to see if Rick posts the resignation letters....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tbone1004

thanks for the clarification, will be waiting to see if Rick posts the resignation letters....

---

Why would he do that? Whose business are those resignation letter, other than that of the board and the board members who resigned?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nakatomi

Why would he do that? Whose business are those resignation letter, other than that of the board and the board members who resigned?

---

Uhh, the members of the NACD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack Hammer

Uhh, the members of the NACD.

---

Yes, I agree.

What I was trying to say was, it's not meant for the public to see, which is why I don't get why it should be posted.

I never said public, just published, so if it's available to the NACD members, then that is valuable information. Either way, the results of the investigation against RN will have to be published as well and that should shed light on a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tbone1004

I never said public, just published, so if it's available to the NACD members, then that is valuable information. Either way, the results of the investigation against RN will have to be published as well and that should shed light on a lot.

---

You said posted, not published.
Nonetheless, I believe the resignation letters should not be published either.

The BoD will need to answer to the NACD members and provide account for their actions.
There is no general right for the public to know who resigned for what reason.

Are you a member of the NACD? If not, of what business are their internal matters to you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nakatomi

...snip...

Are you a member of the NACD? If not, of what business are their internal matters to you?

---

Though this may not have been directed at me, ill answer it. I am a concerned NACD member. Looking at what's going on here, it doesn't add up to what I'm being led to believe. Essentially it it stinks badly and I fear for an organization I believe could do good for the community. The resignation letters may help to clear up the BS.

Sent via