Organization Membership

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-12-2009 10:14 AM
OFG-1

Quote:

Originally Posted by wingman

I was using organiztion in the dynamic sense, as in meteorology. Like a hurricane (also a great song by my favorite artist) the degree of organization can wax and wane (mixing a few metaphors here but then i like a good mixed metaphor). I agree that they all appear to be in a waning mode at the moment. Imagine (also a great song) a merger, there might well be some economies of scale to be gained, especially in publications...they could combine to produce just one quality magazine and keep everything else the same. Everyone would probably be better off and no one would be worse off...in economics we call that pareto optimal...it is irrational not to make a move like that. I can only see better offs here. maybe someone else is good at the worse offs?

Well, metaphorically speaking, go back to your asshat avatar.
11-12-2009 11:11 AM
wingman

Quote:

Originally Posted by OFG-1

Well, metaphorically speaking, go back to your asshat avatar.

<lol> liked that one eh? I like my current anti-nuke one.
11-12-2009 12:47 PM
Sludge

Quote:

Originally Posted by wingman

Imagine (also a great song)

Can you give me another 9-8 suspension?
11-12-2009 02:38 PM
wingman

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slüdge

Can you give me another 9-8 suspension?

Here ya go:
11-12-2009 08:57 PM
Sludge

I was being facetious. I'm sure "Imagine" has more 9-8 suspensions than any other song in the pop era.
11-13-2009 12:51 PM
netmage

Quote:

Originally Posted by wingman

I was using organiztion in the dynamic sense, as in meteorology. Like a hurricane (also a great song by my favorite artist) the degree of organization can wax and wane (mixing a few metaphors here but then i like a good mixed metaphor). I agree that they all appear to be in a waning mode at the moment. Imagine (also a great song) a merger, there might well be some economies of scale to be gained, especially in publications...they could combine to produce just one quality magazine and keep everything else the same. Everyone would probably be better off and no one would be worse off...in economics we call that pareto optimal...it is irrational not to make a move like that. I can only see better offs here. maybe someone else is good at the worse offs?

But which agency or shop would get the coveted advertising space to advance their membership... We can barely get these agencies to agree on standards and safety, much less an editorial review board...
11-13-2009 01:14 PM
caverkevin

What about NFSA? Don't they get any love? WCDC should get some love as well.
11-13-2009 05:34 PM
mfascuba

I'm bad about renewals - NACD is pretty simple, fill out one form, drop it in the mail with a check and I'm done. NSS-CDS requires two memberships, twice the effort, twice the chance of losing a form on my end before it gets in the mailbox, and from what I've seen of the politics, I don't need to get involved in it. Yup, the political climate counts - I'm in the "can't we all get along" camp, as opposed to the "let's fight it out at the meetings" camp. I just want to dive.

Mark
11-13-2009 09:26 PM
rchrds

Or, you could just pay off your life membership, and then you don't have to mail anything. ever. Of course, you might have to live with a lifetime of regret, depending on how shamefully your "organization" acts.

Also- probably the GUE numbers are artificially low, I'm sure they have plenty of "stroke"-free forums of their own.

Jason
11-14-2009 04:43 PM
wingman

Quote:

Originally Posted by rchrds

Also- probably the GUE numbers are artificially low, I'm sure they have plenty of "stroke"-free forums of their own.
Jason

GUE does have a forum but it does not have a lot of activity. Bill

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page