Nick and Bobby
The gas choice wasn't causal here. Plain and simple. And being an ******* about that in the long run dissuades others from posting their accidents.
Look to the greater good. We need to encourage, not discourage, posts like this one.
Nick and Bobby
The gas choice wasn't causal here. Plain and simple. And being an ******* about that in the long run dissuades others from posting their accidents.
Look to the greater good. We need to encourage, not discourage, posts like this one.
Andrew Ainslie
EOL junkie, narcosis freak, deep freak, phlegm freak, lazybastard, testosterone infused freak, mole hole junkie sarcastic a-hole tourist. (citation: http://www.cavediver.net/forum/showt...l=1#post142178)
Sorry I am not all warm and fuzzy. I will not speak of your end again.
Last edited by Caver95; 06-16-2011 at 09:59 PM. Reason: attempting not to be an *******.
Is Soviet way, is good.
Have you ever taken tests to show that you're as alert/responsive/quick/sharp at 170ft as you are at 100ft? My experience is that divers think they're much better at depth than they really are... and really... Sheck... about depth....you know how he died? I respect the hell out of him, but his obsession with depth.... he'd probably still be with us without that.... and he's probably the outlier in any study about the effects of depth on humans.... most likely... YOU'RE NOT SHECK....
AA,
Gary has come on and said that he will adjust his O2 & END on future dives. I did not see his post or I would have worded my post different so you have a point. This is the "Incident & Analysis" thread where we are supposed to discuss and analyze.
Gary,
Thank you for making the adjustment to your deep diving.
I have been around for a while as well and have done the deep air dives a long time ago. What I have seen over the years is a perpetuation of diving deep air and having deep END's because others did it in the past. I have found that lowering my personal END's gives me more clarity on dives and that others who dive with me tend to keep theirs more conservative as well. There have been too many incidents that deep END's are considered a significant contributor. Again thanks Gary, I believe your adjustments will not only make your deep diving more enjoyable and safer but will also influence other divers to follow in the same direction.
Bobby
Bobby
After spending the first three decades learning how much I do not know, I want to spend the next three understanding.
Local Zip Code Diver
Andrew Ainslie
EOL junkie, narcosis freak, deep freak, phlegm freak, lazybastard, testosterone infused freak, mole hole junkie sarcastic a-hole tourist. (citation: http://www.cavediver.net/forum/showt...l=1#post142178)
I'm late to this thread but it sounds similar to my "hit" a year and a half ago. No deco dive, well within limits and similar symptoms after I got OUT of the water. Table six and then a trip to my ENT. Micro tears in the middle ear. I now take Triptone before every dive and clear early and often. Still get dizzy spells when I move my head in a rapid manner, no trouble in the water. I have been prone to motion sickness all my life. ?????
I am a newb compared to many of you but couldn't the ppN2 be considered "causal"?
If this was indeed a case of DCS, at 4.86ppN2 there is considerably more nitrogen to absorb into your system than if using something like 10/70 with a ppN2 of 1.83.
I understand most are discussing the END component, 170 vs. 43 (on something like 10/70) however the fact that there is a considerable amount of nitrogen for tissue loading does seem to be a contributing factor to this result.
If i'm way off please correct me. Thanks
Did you see any critters in that cave? StygoBites.com
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correla...mply_causation
Bookmarks